Blog

Introduction

Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, and heavy metals represent significant challenges to agriculture worldwide [1]. These stresses adversely impact plant growth, development, and productivity, leading to considerable yield losses and jeopardizing global food security. As the global population continues to rise and climate change exacerbates environmental stress conditions, developing crops with enhanced tolerance to abiotic stresses has become imperative for sustainable agriculture. Plants have evolved complex and multifaceted mechanisms to perceive, respond to, and adapt to abiotic stresses [2-3]. These mechanisms include intricate networks of signal perception and transduction, transcriptional regulation, osmotic adjustment, and ion homeostasis. The molecular and genetic basis of these mechanisms is a critical area of research, as understanding these processes can inform strategies to develop stress-resilient crops. Recent advancements in molecular biology and genetic engineering have significantly contributed to our understanding of plant stress responses. Techniques such as quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and functional genomics have been instrumental in identifying key genes and regulatory networks involved in stress tolerance. These insights have paved the way for biotechnological interventions, including the development of transgenic crops, marker-assisted breeding, and synthetic biology approaches [4-5]. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying abiotic stress tolerance in crops. We will delve into the key pathways and genes involved in stress response, exploring how plants perceive and transduce stress signals, regulate stress-responsive gene expression, and maintain osmotic balance and ion homeostasis under stress conditions. Additionally, to discuss recent advances in genetic approaches and biotechnological strategies designed to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in crops. The review will also include case studies highlighting practical applications in major crops such as rice, wheat, maize, and soybean, illustrating the progress made and the challenges that remain. Finally, will explore future perspectives, emphasizing the importance of integrating multi-omics approaches, addressing the impacts of climate change, and navigating the ethical and regulatory landscapes of biotechnological advancements. By providing a detailed examination of the current state of abiotic stress tolerance research, this review aims to contribute to the development of sustainable agricultural practices and the creation of crop varieties capable of withstanding the increasing environmental challenges of the 21st century [6].

2. Molecular Mechanisms of Abiotic Stress Tolerance

Abiotic stress tolerance in plants involves a complex array of molecular mechanisms that allow them to perceive, respond to, and adapt to adverse environmental conditions [7]. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to enhance stress tolerance in crops. This section explores the molecular basis of abiotic stress tolerance, focusing on signal perception and transduction pathways.

2.1 Signal Perception and Transduction

Abiotic stress tolerance begins with the perception of stress signals by plant cells. This perception is mediated by various receptors and sensors that detect changes in the environment and initiate downstream signaling cascades [8]. These signaling pathways ultimately lead to the activation of stress-responsive genes and physiological responses that help the plant cope with stress.

Receptors and Sensors

Plants possess a variety of receptors and sensors that detect abiotic stress signals. These include membrane-bound receptor-like kinases (RLKs), histidine kinases, and ion channels [9]. RLKs play a crucial role in sensing environmental stimuli and initiating signal transduction pathways. For example, RLKs have been implicated in detecting osmotic stress, salinity, and temperature changes. Additionally, histidine kinases, which are part of the two-component signaling system, are involved in perceiving osmotic and drought stress.

Ion channels, particularly calcium (Ca²⁺) channels, are essential sensors of abiotic stress. Changes in cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels act as secondary messengers in response to various stress signals. Specific Ca²⁺ channels on the plasma membrane and endomembranes facilitate the rapid influx of Ca²⁺ into the cytosol, triggering downstream signaling events [10].

Signal Transduction Pathways

Once stress signals are perceived, they are transduced through various signaling pathways that amplify and propagate the signal to the appropriate cellular targets. Two key signal transduction pathways involved in abiotic stress responses are the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and Ca²⁺ signaling 11].

MAPK Pathway

The MAPK pathway is a highly conserved signaling cascade that transduces extracellular signals into intracellular responses. It comprises three sequentially activated kinases: MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK), MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK), and MAP kinase (MAPK). In response to abiotic stress, such as drought or salinity, MAPKKKs are activated, which in turn activate MAPKKs and subsequently MAPKs. Activated MAPKs phosphorylate various target proteins, including transcription factors, leading to the expression of stress-responsive genes [12]. The MAPK pathway is involved in regulating a wide range of stress responses, including osmotic adjustment, antioxidant defense, and programmed cell death. For example, the MAPK cascade has been shown to regulate the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of osmoprotectants, such as proline and glycine betaine, which help maintain cellular osmotic balance under stress conditions [13].

Ca²⁺ Signaling

Ca²⁺ signaling is a universal mechanism in plant cells for transducing abiotic stress signals. Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ levels act as a secondary messenger in response to stress. Specific Ca²⁺ channels and transporters mediate the influx and efflux of Ca²⁺ across the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments, generating Ca²⁺ signatures that encode information about the type and intensity of the stress [14].

Ca²⁺ sensors, such as calmodulins (CaMs), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), decode these Ca2+ signatures and activate downstream signaling pathways. For instance, CDPKs phosphorylate target proteins, including transcription factors and enzymes, leading to the activation of stress-responsive genes [15]. Ca²⁺ signaling also interacts with other signaling pathways, such as the MAPK pathway, to coordinate complex stress responses, the perception and transduction of abiotic stress signals in plants involve a sophisticated network of receptors, sensors, and signaling pathways. The MAPK and Ca²⁺ signaling pathways play pivotal roles in amplifying and transmitting stress signals, ultimately leading to the activation of adaptive responses that enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Understanding these molecular mechanisms provides a foundation for developing strategies to improve stress tolerance in crops through genetic and biotechnological approaches.

2.2 Stress-Responsive Gene Expression

The ability of plants to tolerate abiotic stresses is largely governed by the regulation of gene expression in response to environmental cues. Stress-responsive gene expression involves a complex interplay between transcription factors and epigenetic modifications, which collectively modulate the expression of genes that confer stress tolerance [16].

Transcription Factors

Transcription factors (TFs) are pivotal regulators of gene expression that bind to specific DNA sequences and activate or repress the transcription of target genes. Several families of TFs are particularly important in mediating abiotic stress responses in plants, including the DREB, NAC, and WRKY families.

DREB (Dehydration-Responsive Element-Binding) Transcription Factors

DREB TFs are part of the larger AP2/ERF (APETALA2/ethylene-responsive factor) family and play a crucial role in the response to dehydration, salinity, and cold stress. They bind to dehydration-responsive elements (DRE/CRT) in the promoters of stress-inducible genes. The DREB family is divided into two subgroups: DREB1 and DREB2. DREB1 TFs are primarily involved in cold stress responses, whereas DREB2 TFs are associated with dehydration and salinity stress. Overexpression of DREB TFs in transgenic plants has been shown to enhance tolerance to these stresses by upregulating genes involved in osmoprotectant biosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and water transport [17].

NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) Transcription Factors

NAC TFs constitute one of the largest families of plant-specific TFs and are involved in various stress responses, including drought, salinity, and temperature extremes. They regulate genes associated with cell wall remodeling, detoxification, and stress signaling pathways. NAC TFs typically contain a conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a variable C-terminal domain that mediates transcriptional regulation. Several NAC TFs have been identified as key regulators of abiotic stress tolerance, and their overexpression in model plants has led to improved stress resilience.

WRKY Transcription Factors

WRKY TFs are characterized by the presence of one or more WRKY domains, which bind to W-box elements in the promoters of target genes. They play a significant role in modulating plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. WRKY TFs are involved in the regulation of genes related to hormone signaling, secondary metabolism, and stress response pathways. Studies have shown that WRKY TFs can either positively or negatively regulate stress-responsive genes, highlighting their diverse roles in stress adaptation [18].

Epigenetic Modifications

Epigenetic modifications are heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations in the DNA sequence. These modifications include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling, all of which play crucial roles in regulating stress-responsive gene expression.

DNA Methylation

DNA methylation involves the addition of a methyl group to the 5th carbon of cytosine residues, typically within CpG dinucleotides. This modification can repress gene expression by preventing the binding of transcriptional activators or recruiting repressive complexes. In response to abiotic stress, dynamic changes in DNA methylation patterns have been observed, leading to the activation or repression of stress-responsive genes. For example, demethylation of specific promoter regions can activate genes involved in osmoprotectant biosynthesis and antioxidant defense, enhancing stress tolerance.

Histone Modifications

Histone modifications, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, alter the chromatin structure and affect gene expression. Histone acetylation, typically associated with gene activation, is mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), while histone deacetylation, associated with gene repression, is mediated by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Histone methylation can have either activating or repressive effects, depending on the specific residues and the context of the modification and to abiotic stress, histone modifications play a critical role in regulating stress-responsive genes. For instance, increased histone acetylation at stress-responsive gene promoters is correlated with enhanced gene expression and improved stress tolerance [19]. Conversely, histone deacetylation at these promoters can lead to gene repression and increased sensitivity to stress.

Chromatin Remodeling

Chromatin remodeling involves the ATP-dependent restructuring of chromatin to regulate access to DNA. Chromatin remodelers, such as SWI/SNF and ISWI complexes, reposition, eject, or restructure nucleosomes, thereby influencing gene expression. During abiotic stress, chromatin remodeling complexes can facilitate the activation of stress-responsive genes by making the chromatin more accessible to transcription factors and other regulatory proteins, stress-responsive gene expression in plants involves a sophisticated network of transcription factors and epigenetic modifications. Transcription factors such as DREB, NAC, and WRKY families play central roles in activating or repressing stress-responsive genes [20]. Concurrently, epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling, dynamically regulate the accessibility and expression of these genes. Understanding these molecular mechanisms provides valuable insights for developing strategies to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in crops, ultimately contributing to sustainable agricultural practices.

2.3 Osmotic Adjustment and Ion Homeostasis

Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and temperature extremes can cause significant osmotic and ionic imbalances in plant cells. Plants have evolved mechanisms to adjust their osmotic potential and maintain ion homeostasis, which are crucial for survival and continued growth under stress conditions. This section discusses the roles of osmoprotectants and ion transporters in mediating these processes.

Osmoprotectants

Osmoprotectants, also known as compatible solutes, are small organic molecules that plants accumulate in response to osmotic stress. These compounds help to stabilize proteins and cellular structures, protect the integrity of membranes, and maintain cellular osmotic balance without interfering with normal metabolic processes. Two of the most well-studied osmoprotectants are proline and glycine betaine.

Proline

Proline is an amino acid that accumulates in many plant species under various abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures. It acts as an osmoprotectant by stabilizing subcellular structures, scavenging free radicals, and protecting proteins from denaturation. Proline biosynthesis is primarily regulated by the enzyme Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), which is upregulated under stress conditions. Additionally, proline degradation is minimized during stress, ensuring its accumulation. Transgenic plants overexpressing P5CS exhibit enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress, demonstrating the crucial role of proline in stress adaptation.

Glycine Betaine

Glycine betaine is a quaternary ammonium compound that protects plants against osmotic stress by stabilizing the structure and function of proteins and membranes. It is synthesized from choline through a two-step oxidation process involving choline monooxygenase (CMO) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH). Glycine betaine accumulates in response to salinity, drought, and cold stress. Studies have shown that exogenous application or genetic engineering to enhance glycine betaine synthesis can improve stress tolerance in various crops by maintaining cellular osmotic balance and protecting photosynthetic machinery [21].

Ion Transporters

Ion transporters play a crucial role in maintaining ion homeostasis under abiotic stress conditions. They regulate the uptake, compartmentalization, and efflux of ions, thereby preventing toxic ion accumulation and ensuring the proper ionic balance required for cellular functions. Two important classes of ion transporters involved in stress tolerance are HKT (high-affinity potassium transporters) and NHX (Na+/H+ exchangers).

HKT (High-Affinity Potassium Transporters)

HKT transporters are primarily involved in the regulation of sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) homeostasis. They help to prevent Na+ toxicity and maintain K⁺ levels, which are essential for various cellular processes. HKT1;1, a well-characterized member of the HKT family, mediates Na+ transport from the roots to the shoots, thereby reducing Na+ accumulation in the shoots. This selective Na+ transport helps to protect photosynthetic tissues from Na+ toxicity and ensures proper K+ nutrition. Overexpression of HKT1;1 has been shown to enhance salinity tolerance in crops by reducing Na+ accumulation in the aerial parts and maintaining ion homeostasis [22].

NHX (Na⁺/H⁺ Exchangers)

NHX transporters are crucial for the compartmentalization of Na⁺ into vacuoles, thereby reducing cytosolic Na+ levels and mitigating ion toxicity. NHX1, a well-studied Na+/H+ antiporter, is localized to the vacuolar membrane and facilitates the exchange of Na+ for H⁺, sequestering Na+ into vacuoles. This process not only prevents Na+ toxicity but also helps to maintain cellular osmotic balance by increasing vacuolar osmotic potential. Overexpression of NHX1 in transgenic plants has been shown to improve salinity tolerance by enhancing Na+ compartmentalization and maintaining cytosolic ion homeostasis [7], osmotic adjustment and ion homeostasis are critical components of plant responses to abiotic stress. Osmoprotectants like proline and glycine betaine help to stabilize cellular structures and maintain osmotic balance, while ion transporters such as HKT and NHX regulate ion uptake, compartmentalization, and efflux to prevent toxicity and ensure proper ionic balance and these mechanisms provides valuable insights into developing strategies to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in crops, contributing to more resilient agricultural systems [15].

3. Genetic Basis of Abiotic Stress Tolerance

The genetic basis of abiotic stress tolerance in plants is complex and often involves multiple genes and pathways. Understanding this genetic foundation is essential for developing crop varieties that can withstand adverse environmental conditions [19]. This section discusses the use of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in identifying genetic regions associated with stress tolerance and the application of marker-assisted selection (MAS) in breeding programs.

3.1 Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping

Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping is a powerful tool for identifying regions of the genome that are associated with complex traits, such as abiotic stress tolerance. QTLs are genomic regions that contain one or more genes contributing to the variation in a quantitative trait. By mapping these loci, researchers can identify genetic markers linked to stress tolerance traits, facilitating the development of stress-resilient crops through marker-assisted selection [19].

Identification of QTLs Associated with Stress Tolerance

QTL mapping involves crossing two parent plants that differ in the trait of interest (e.g., stress tolerance) and analyzing their progeny. The progeny are phenotyped for the trait and genotyped using molecular markers. Statistical methods are then used to associate variations in the trait with specific genomic regions, thereby identifying QTLs [3]. For abiotic stress tolerance, QTLs have been identified for traits such as drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, and cold tolerance. For example:

Drought Tolerance: QTLs associated with drought tolerance have been identified in major crops such as rice, maize, and wheat. These QTLs are linked to traits like root architecture, stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment, which contribute to water use efficiency and drought resilience.

Salinity Tolerance: In rice, QTLs for salinity tolerance have been mapped to regions associated with sodium exclusion, potassium uptake, and osmoprotectant biosynthesis. Notable QTLs like Saltol in rice have been extensively studied for their role in maintaining ion homeostasis under saline conditions.

Cold Tolerance: In wheat and barley, QTLs for cold tolerance have been identified, with traits linked to cold-induced proteins, antifreeze proteins, and membrane stability. These QTLs help plants withstand freezing temperatures and recover from cold stress [6-7].

Marker-Assisted Selection

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a breeding technique that uses molecular markers linked to desirable traits to select plants with those traits. MAS accelerates the breeding process by allowing for the early and precise selection of progeny carrying the target QTLs, even before phenotypic traits are expressed.

Application of MAS in Abiotic Stress Tolerance Breeding

MAS has been successfully applied in breeding programs to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in various crops. The process typically involves the following steps:

1. Marker Development: Molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertion-deletion polymorphisms (Indels) are developed and validated for their association with target QTLs.

2. Marker Screening: Breeding populations are screened for the presence of these markers, identifying individuals that carry the desirable QTLs.

3. Selection and Cross-Breeding: Selected individuals are used in cross-breeding programs to combine multiple QTLs for enhanced stress tolerance.

4. Backcrossing and Validation: Backcrossing with elite parent lines ensures the introgression of stress tolerance traits while maintaining desirable agronomic characteristics. Progeny are further validated for trait expression under stress conditions.

QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection are pivotal tools in unraveling the genetic basis of abiotic stress tolerance and applying this knowledge in crop improvement programs. By identifying and utilizing QTLs associated with stress tolerance, researchers and breeders can develop crop varieties that are better equipped to thrive in challenging environmental conditions, thereby contributing to global food security and sustainable agriculture [11]. 

3.2 Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged as a powerful approach to identify genes and genetic variants associated with complex traits, including abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Unlike QTL mapping, which relies on bi-parental populations, GWAS leverages natural genetic variation in diverse populations. By scanning the entire genome for associations between genetic markers and phenotypic traits, GWAS can pinpoint specific loci and candidate genes that contribute to stress tolerance.

GWAS has been successfully applied in various crops to identify genes associated with drought, salinity, heat, and cold tolerance. For instance, in rice, GWAS has revealed several key genes involved in drought tolerance, such as those regulating root architecture, osmotic adjustment, and hormonal pathways. Similarly, in maize, GWAS has identified loci associated with traits like stomatal conductance and leaf water content under drought conditions. These findings provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of stress responses and offer potential targets for genetic improvement [12].

Applications in Crop Improvement

The application of GWAS in crop improvement involves integrating identified stress-tolerance genes into breeding programs to develop resilient crop varieties. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) can be employed to select plants with desirable alleles for stress tolerance traits. Additionally, the candidate genes identified through GWAS can be further validated and functionally characterized using gene editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9. This allows for precise modifications to enhance stress tolerance without compromising other agronomic traits. For example, in wheat, GWAS has identified genes associated with cold tolerance that are now being targeted for breeding programs to develop varieties capable of withstanding low temperatures. Similarly, genes identified through GWAS for salinity tolerance in barley are being used to breed salt-tolerant varieties. By combining GWAS with modern breeding techniques, researchers can accelerate the development of crops that are better adapted to changing environmental conditions, ultimately contributing to sustainable agriculture and food security.

3.3 Functional Genomics Approaches

Functional genomics approaches are essential for understanding the roles of specific genes in abiotic stress tolerance and for translating this knowledge into practical applications for crop improvement. These approaches enable researchers to dissect gene functions, regulatory networks, and molecular mechanisms underlying stress responses. Two prominent methods in functional genomics are gene knockout/knockdown studies and genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 [17].

Gene Knockout/Knockdown Studies

Gene knockout and knockdown techniques involve disrupting or reducing the expression of specific genes to assess their roles in stress responses. Gene knockout, which results in a complete loss of gene function, can be achieved through techniques such as T-DNA insertion or targeted mutagenesis. Gene knockdown, which reduces but does not entirely eliminate gene expression, is often accomplished using RNA interference (RNAi) or antisense RNA technologies. By analyzing the phenotypic consequences of these genetic alterations under stress conditions, researchers can identify genes critical for tolerance mechanisms [13].

For example, knockout studies of genes involved in proline biosynthesis or ion transport have provided insights into their roles in osmotic adjustment and ion homeostasis under stress. Knockdown of stress-responsive transcription factors can reveal their contributions to regulating stress-induced gene expression and tolerance. These studies are instrumental in elucidating the functional relationships between genes and stress responses, thereby guiding the development of stress-tolerant crops.

CRISPR/Cas9 and Other Genome Editing Technologies

CRISPR/Cas9 and other genome editing technologies, such as TALENs (transcription activator-like effector nucleases) and ZFNs (zinc finger nucleases), offer precise and efficient methods for altering specific genes in the genome. CRISPR/Cas9, in particular, has revolutionized functional genomics by enabling targeted modifications of DNA sequences, including gene knockouts, insertions, and point mutations. This technology allows for the precise editing of genes involved in stress tolerance, facilitating the study of their functions and the development of crops with enhanced stress resilience [12].

For instance, CRISPR/Cas9 has been used to knockout genes encoding stress-responsive transcription factors, resulting in plants with altered stress responses and improved tolerance. It has also been employed to introduce beneficial alleles or modify regulatory elements to enhance stress tolerance traits. In addition to CRISPR/Cas9, other genome editing technologies like TALENs and ZFNs have been used to create genetic variations that improve stress tolerance in crops. By integrating functional genomics approaches with advanced genome editing technologies, researchers can gain deeper insights into the genetic basis of abiotic stress tolerance and develop crop varieties with improved resilience to environmental stresses. These advancements hold the potential to significantly enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability in the face of changing climate conditions [22].

7. Conclusion

Developing crops with enhanced abiotic stress tolerance is increasingly crucial to securing global food supplies amidst escalating environmental challenges. Advances in molecular and genetic research have provided substantial insights into the complex mechanisms underlying plant responses to stress. Techniques such as quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and functional genomics have illuminated key genetic and molecular factors involved in stress tolerance. These breakthroughs have paved the way for innovative breeding strategies and biotechnological interventions aimed at improving crop resilience, future research should focus on integrating multi-omics approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of stress tolerance mechanisms. By combining genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, researchers can unravel the intricate networks and pathways that confer stress resilience. Additionally, addressing the impacts of climate change on stress responses will be crucial for developing crops that can withstand the evolving environmental conditions. Navigating the ethical and regulatory landscapes surrounding biotechnological advancements will also be essential to ensure the safe and equitable application of new technologies in agriculture, advancements in stress tolerance research, coupled with a holistic and collaborative approach, are essential for developing crop varieties that can thrive under adverse conditions. These efforts will play a vital role in ensuring food security and fostering sustainable agricultural practices in the face of an unpredictable climate.

References

• Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science, 166(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.014

• Bohnert, H. J., & Jensen, R. G. (1996). Strategies for engineering water-stress tolerance in plants. Trends in Biotechnology, 14(4), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(96)10011-7

• Chaves, M. M., Pereira, J. S., & Maroco, J. P. (2002). Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 29(3), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076

• Claeys, H., & Inzé, D. (2013). The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Molecular Plant, 6(2), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss123

• Farooq, M., Hussain, M., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2012). Drought stress in plants: Implications, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(2), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0066-5

• Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008). Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist, 179(4), 945-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x

• Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). The role of plant hormones in regulating stress responses and plant growth under environmental stress conditions. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 35(4), 609-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-017-1057-4
• Liu, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Genetic engineering for drought resistance in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00172

• Miller, G., & Mittler, R. (2006). Plant responses to drought and salinity stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 9(3), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.003

• Nakashima, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2013). ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Reports, 32(8), 1377-1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1465-3

• Pardo, J. M., & Gao, X. (2017). Genetic manipulation of plant ion transporters to improve stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01075

• Seki, M., & Shinozaki, K. (2007). Genomics and functional analysis of stress-responsive genes in plants. In Plant Stress Biology: From Genomics to Proteomics (pp. 193-216). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5008-4_8

• Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2007). Regulation of plant growth and stress responses by ABA. Plant and Cell Physiology, 48(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm082

• Shukla, M. R., & Pandey, R. (2018). The role of heat shock proteins in plant stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(17), 4337-4346. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery319

• 17. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2006). Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57, 781-803. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105434

• Idoko, J. A., Osang, P. O., & Ijoyah, M. O. (2016). Evaluation of the agronomic characters of three sweet potato varieties for intercropping with soybean in Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah, Nigeria. Plant Science Archives.

• 19. Zhu, J.-K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
• Idoko, J. A., Osang, P. O., & Ijoyah, M. O. (2016). Evaluation of the agronomic characters of three sweet potato varieties for intercropping with soybean in Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah, Nigeria. Plant Science Archives.

• Islam, M. S., Rahman, M. M., & Paul, N. K. (2016). Arsenicinduced morphological variations and the role of phosphorus in alleviating arsenic toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Science Archives, 1(1), 1-10.

• 21. Kulik, A., & Müller, M. (2018). Functional genomics in the study of stress responses: From genes to crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69 (21), 5407-5418. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery348

• Niranjana, C. (2016). Characterization of bacteriocin from lactic acid bacteria and its antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum causing tomato wilt. Plant Science Archives.

• Okunlola, A. I., Opeyemi, M. A., Adepoju, A. O., & Adekunle, V. A. J. (2016). Estimation of carbon stock of trees in urban parking lots of the Federal University OF Technology, Akure, Nigeria (Futa). Plant Science Archives.