1. Introduction
The Earth’s climate is undergoing rapid and unprecedented changes, driven primarily by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases [34]. This global phenomenon manifests as rising average temperatures, altered precipitation regimes, increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO$_2$) concentrations, and a greater frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heatwaves, droughts, floods, and storms [33]. These climatic shifts exert profound impacts across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, none more critical to human well-being than agricultural systems. Global food security, already challenged by a burgeoning human population and diminishing arable land, faces an escalating threat from climate change, with direct consequences on crop productivity and food supply chains [25, 68].
Among the myriad ways climate change influences agriculture, its profound effects on insect pest dynamics are particularly alarming. Insects, being poikilothermic organisms, are highly sensitive to temperature and other climatic variables, which directly influence their physiology, development, reproduction, and survival. Consequently, even subtle shifts in climate can trigger significant changes in insect pest populations, including alterations in their geographical distribution, phenology (timing of life cycle events), abundance, and interactions with host plants and natural enemies [48, 4].These climate-induced shifts can transform previously innocuous species into major threats, exacerbate the impact of existing pests, or facilitate the invasion of new, highly destructive species into vulnerable agricultural regions [17]. Historically, integrated pest management (IPM) strategies have been developed based on relatively stable climatic norms and predictable pest life cycles. However, a rapidly changing climate undermines the efficacy of these established practices, demanding a fundamental rethinking and adaptation of pest management approaches [36].The economic consequences of uncontrolled insect pest outbreaks are staggering, with estimated global crop losses due to pests averaging 10-16%, translating to billions of dollars annually, a figure projected to rise under future climate scenarios [55, 17].Beyond direct yield losses, pest population shifts can disrupt agricultural trade, necessitate increased pesticide use (with associated environmental and health risks), and destabilize farmer livelihoods, particularly in developing countries that are disproportionately vulnerable to climate impacts [71].This comprehensive review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of climate-induced insect pest dynamics within agricultural systems. It will systematically explore the fundamental mechanisms through which key climatic variables influence insect physiology and ecology, detailing the observed and predicted shifts in pest populations worldwide. The review will critically examine the diverse methodologies employed to predict these complex dynamics, from traditional mechanistic models to cutting-edge remote sensing and ‘omics’ technologies. Crucially, it will then delve into the imperative of adapting and enhancing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies to build climate-resilient agricultural systems, offering a detailed discussion of each IPM component. Illustrative case studies of significant climate-induced pest outbreaks will underscore the practical implications and management challenges. Finally, the review will highlight the remaining challenges and outline future research directions necessary to effectively predict, mitigate, and manage the escalating threat of insect pests in a warming world, ensuring sustainable food production for generations to come.
2. Mechanisms of Climate Change Impact on Insect Pests
Insect pests, as poikilothermic (cold-blooded) organisms, are inherently sensitive to ambient environmental conditions. Climate change components – temperature, CO2 concentration, precipitation patterns, and extreme weather events – exert multifaceted influences on insect physiology, ecology, and population dynamics, often in complex, interacting ways. Understanding these fundamental mechanisms is crucial for predicting future pest dynamics.
2.1. Temperature
Temperature is arguably the most pervasive and direct climatic factor influencing insect life histories. Its effects propagate through virtually all physiological processes, from cellular metabolism to reproductive success.
Direct Effects on Development: Insect development rates are highly temperature-dependent, typically increasing with rising temperatures within an optimal range. Each insect species has a specific temperature range, defined by a lower developmental threshold (minimum temperature for development to occur), an optimal temperature (where development is fastest), and an upper lethal limit (where development ceases, and mortality occurs) [58]. As global temperatures rise, many insects, especially those in temperate or subtropical zones, experience conditions closer to or within their optimal range, leading to faster larval development, shorter generation times, and consequently, more generations per year (increased voltinism). This can dramatically amplify pest populations. For instance, a small increase in average temperature can allow a pest to complete an additional generation in a growing season, potentially doubling its population size or extending its activity period [4].
Reproduction and Fecundity: Temperature also directly affects insect reproduction. Within the optimal range, higher temperatures generally lead to increased metabolic rates, faster maturation of reproductive organs, and increased egg production (fecundity). However, temperatures exceeding the optimal range can lead to reduced fecundity, infertility, and ultimately, reproductive failure [31]. The sex ratio of some insects can also be temperature-dependent.
Survival and Mortality: Extreme temperatures, both hot and cold, can be lethal. While warming trends might reduce cold-induced mortality in winter (facilitating overwintering survival or poleward range expansion), extreme heat waves can cause direct mortality, especially if insects lack behavioral (e.g., seeking shade) or physiological (e.g., heat shock proteins) adaptations [16]. Drought-induced heat stress can be particularly damaging.
Geographical Range Shifts: As thermal isotherms shift towards the poles and higher altitudes, insect species with lower thermal optima or those previously limited by cold temperatures can expand their geographical ranges into new territories [48]. Conversely, species adapted to cooler climates might experience range contractions from their equatorial or lower-altitude boundaries, though these are less commonly observed as pest threats.
Diapause and Overwintering: Temperature plays a critical role in inducing and terminating diapause, a state of arrested development that allows insects to survive unfavorable conditions like winter. Warmer winters can lead to reduced diapause intensity, earlier diapause termination, or even incomplete diapause, potentially exposing insects to subsequent cold snaps or allowing for earlier spring emergence and an extended active season [14].
Metabolic Rate and Energy Budget: Higher temperatures increase metabolic rates, leading to faster energy expenditure. While this can accelerate development, it can also necessitate increased food consumption and potentially reduce adult longevity if energy reserves are depleted too quickly [39]. This can indirectly affect pest damage.
2.2. CO2Concentration
Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, while directly impacting plant physiology, have complex and often indirect effects on insect pests.
Host Plant Quality: Increased CO2generally leads to “CO2 fertilization” in C3 plants (the majority of crops), stimulating photosynthesis, biomass accumulation, and often increasing the carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio in plant tissues [51].This means plants become richer in carbohydrates but poorer in nitrogen, which is a critical nutrient for insect growth and development.
Compensatory Feeding: Many herbivorous insects, particularly those with high nitrogen demands, may respond to lower nitrogen content by consuming more plant tissue to obtain sufficient nutrients (compensatory feeding). This can lead to increased damage per individual insect, even if individual insect performance (e.g., growth rate) is slightly reduced [72]. Altered Secondary Metabolites: Elevated CO2can also alter the production of plant secondary metabolites, including defensive compounds (e.g., phenolics, tannins, terpenoids) [8].The impact can vary: some defensive compounds may increase, reducing palatability or toxicity, while others may decrease, making plants more susceptible.
Nutritional Dilution: Overall, the “nutritional dilution” effect is a significant concern, potentially leading to increased feeding rates and thus greater crop damage for a range of insect pests [51].
2.3. Precipitation
Changes in precipitation patterns – including overall rainfall amount, frequency, intensity, and timing – can significantly influence insect pests.
Direct Effects:
Mortality: Extreme rainfall events (floods) can cause direct mortality to soil-dwelling insects or pupae, wash away eggs, or drown active stages. Conversely, prolonged droughts can reduce humidity, increase desiccation stress, and lead to mortality [2].
Dispersal: Strong winds associated with storms can aid the long-distance dispersal of winged insects, potentially expanding their ranges or rapidly initiating new outbreaks (e.g., locusts).
Indirect Effects (through Host Plants):
Host Plant Availability and Vigor: Precipitation directly dictates soil moisture and host plant growth. Droughts can lead to stressed, weaker plants that may be more susceptible to some pests (e.g., bark beetles attacking drought-stressed trees) or less palatable to others. Conversely, sufficient rainfall ensures lush vegetation, which can support larger pest populations [45].
Water-Mediated Plant Defenses: Water stress can alter plant defense mechanisms, potentially making them more vulnerable or more resistant to specific pests.
Indirect Effects (on Natural Enemies and Pathogens):
Fungal Pathogens: Many entomopathogenic fungi, which naturally regulate insect populations, require high humidity for sporulation and infection [27]. Drought conditions can suppress these natural enemies, leading to increased pest survival.
Predator/Parasitoid Abundance: Extreme precipitation or prolonged drought can negatively impact the abundance or effectiveness of insect predators and parasitoids, potentially leading to “enemy release” and subsequent pest outbreaks.
2.4. Extreme Weather Events
Beyond gradual shifts in averages, the increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose acute challenges.
Heatwaves: Can cause widespread direct mortality if temperatures exceed physiological limits, particularly for insects without access to refugia [38]. However, some insects may adapt or exploit shorter, intense heat periods.
Droughts: As discussed, prolonged periods of low rainfall lead to water stress, affecting insect survival directly (desiccation) and indirectly (host plant quality, natural enemy suppression).
Floods: Can drown terrestrial insects, wash away eggs, and destroy habitats [2].
Storms (Hurricanes, Cyclones, Strong Winds):
Mortality: Direct physical damage and mortality.
Dispersal: Can facilitate long-distance, rapid dispersal of highly mobile pests (e.g., fall armyworm, locusts, aphids) beyond their typical range, leading to sudden invasions of new areas [69].
Habitat Destruction: Can destroy host crops, forcing pests to migrate or perish.
Unseasonable Frosts: While overall warming trends reduce cold snaps, unseasonable frosts after early spring emergence (due to warmer temperatures) can cause significant mortality to pest populations that have already broken diapause [50].
2.5. Interacting Effects of Multiple Climate Factors
The most challenging aspect of predicting climate-induced pest dynamics is the complex interplay of these multiple factors. Effects are rarely additive; they can be synergistic, antagonistic, or highly context-dependent.
Temperature and CO2: The combined effect of rising temperatures (accelerating development) and elevated CO2 (potentially increasing feeding due to nutritional dilution) can lead to significantly higher pest damage than either factor alone [17].
Drought and Heat: Often co-occurring, these stresses can weaken host plants, making them more susceptible, while simultaneously impacting pest physiology and natural enemy populations. For example, bark beetle outbreaks are often exacerbated by drought-stressed trees, which have compromised defensive mechanisms [24].
Precipitation and Temperature: A combination of increased rainfall (supporting lush growth) and higher temperatures (accelerating development) can create ideal conditions for rapid pest population growth. Conversely, extreme heat combined with drought can be devastating for both plants and insects.
Understanding these intricate, context-dependent interactions is vital for developing accurate predictive models and effective, adaptive management strategies.
3. Observed and Predicted Insect Pest Population Shifts
The impacts of climate change on insect pest populations are no longer theoretical predictions but have been widely observed globally. These shifts manifest in several key ways, collectively presenting new challenges for agricultural management.
3.1. Geographical Range Expansion/Contraction
One of the most evident responses of insect pests to warming temperatures is the shift in their geographical distribution.
Poleward and Altitudinal Shifts: Many insect species are expanding their ranges towards higher latitudes (poleward) and higher altitudes. This is primarily driven by warmer temperatures enabling insects to survive and reproduce in areas previously too cold for them [48].
Examples:
Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys): This invasive polyphagous pest, originating from East Asia, has rapidly expanded its range across North America and Europe, partly facilitated by warming winters that improve its overwintering survival [42].
Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): Native to tropical and subtropical Americas, this highly destructive polyphagous pest has rapidly spread across Africa, Asia, and Australia since 2016. While facilitated by human trade, its successful establishment and spread are significantly aided by warmer temperatures, extending its potential range and allowing multiple generations per year [20].
Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata): Has been observed to expand its range northward in Europe as temperatures rise, allowing it to complete more generations and survive winters in previously colder regions [11].
Bark Beetles (Dendroctonus spp.): In temperate and boreal forests, warmer temperatures have enabled bark beetles to expand their ranges to higher latitudes and altitudes, contributing to unprecedented outbreaks by reducing overwintering mortality and increasing voltinism (e.g., mountain pine beetle in North America, spruce bark beetle in Europe) [7].
Contractions: While less commonly observed in pest species, range contractions can occur for species adapted to cooler climates if temperatures in their southern or lower-altitude range exceed their thermal optimum. However, species of agricultural concern are often generalists or those that thrive in warmer conditions, hence expansions are more prominent.
3.2. Changes in Phenology
Phenology refers to the timing of recurring biological phenomena, such as emergence, flowering, migration, and reproduction, which are highly sensitive to temperature cues. Climate change is causing significant alterations in insect phenology.
Earlier Emergence and Prolonged Seasons: Warmer spring temperatures lead to earlier adult emergence, earlier diapause termination, and thus an earlier start to the growing season for many pests [47]. This can extend the period over which crops are exposed to pest pressure.
Examples:
Aphids: Many aphid species (e.g., cotton aphid, green peach aphid) are emerging earlier in the spring and persisting longer into the autumn in temperate regions, leading to extended periods of infestation and increased virus transmission [28].
European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis): In parts of its range, this pest is emerging earlier due to warmer spring temperatures, potentially leading to earlier damage to maize crops [56].
Altered Synchrony (Phenological Mismatch): This is a critical ecological consequence where the timing of life cycle events between interacting species (e.g., pest and host plant, pest and natural enemy) becomes desynchronized.
Pest-Host Plant Mismatch: If pests emerge earlier but their host plants do not, or vice versa, it can lead to reduced pest success. However, more often, pests with broader thermal reaction norms or more flexible phenology can adapt faster than their hosts, leading to prolonged attack or exploitation of new phenological windows (e.g., earlier susceptible stages of crops) [66].
Pest-Natural Enemy Mismatch: Perhaps the most concerning mismatch is between pests and their natural enemies (predators, parasitoids). If natural enemies emerge later or are less active under novel temperature regimes, or if their development is less accelerated than the pest, their ability to regulate pest populations can be severely compromised, leading to “enemy release” and subsequent outbreaks [37].This has been observed for some parasitoid-host systems.
3.3. Increased Voltinism
Voltinism refers to the number of generations an insect completes within a year. As development rates accelerate with warmer temperatures, many multivoltine (multiple generations per year) pest species are completing more generations per growing season.
Increased Reproductive Potential: An increase in just one additional generation can lead to an exponential increase in pest populations, as each generation adds to the reproductive potential. For example, a pest completing three generations instead of two can lead to a significantly larger cumulative population by the end of the season, assuming favorable conditions [17].
Examples:
Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae): These ubiquitous polyphagous pests have increased voltinism under warmer conditions, leading to rapid population build-up and severe damage to many horticultural and field crops [64].
Cotton Bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera): This major global pest is projected to complete more generations per year in many regions due to rising temperatures, increasing its impact on cotton and other crops [70].
Cereal Leaf Beetle (Oulema melanopus): Has shown increased voltinism in some regions, prolonging its feeding damage on cereal crops [29].
3.4. Altered Community Composition and Species Interactions
Climate change can disrupt existing ecological communities, leading to novel pest complexes and altered interspecific interactions.
New Pest Complexes: As species expand their ranges, new pest-host associations or new pest-pest interactions can emerge in agricultural landscapes [60].A pest previously geographically restricted might encounter new susceptible crops or compete with, or displace, native pest species.
Enemy Release: As discussed under phenological mismatch, natural enemies may be more sensitive to climate change than their hosts, leading to a reduction in their effectiveness. This “enemy release” phenomenon can result in the explosive growth of pest populations [46]
Competitive Dynamics: Changes in temperature regimes can alter competitive hierarchies among insect species. A warmer-adapted pest might outcompete a cooler-adapted native pest, leading to shifts in dominant pest species in a region.
Vector-Borne Diseases: Many insect pests are also vectors of plant diseases (e.g., aphids transmitting viruses, whiteflies transmitting geminiviruses). Climate-induced range expansions or increased populations of these vectors can lead to a greater incidence and spread of plant diseases in new areas [26]. For example, warmer winters can facilitate the survival and earlier emergence of aphid vectors, increasing the risk of potato virus Y (PVY) spread.
3.5. Increased Outbreak Frequency and Severity
The cumulative effect of favorable temperatures, increased voltinism, phenological synchrony with host plants, and potential enemy release often translates into more frequent and severe insect pest outbreaks.
Destabilized Population Dynamics: Climate variability, particularly increased frequency of extreme events, can push insect populations beyond their normal regulatory limits, leading to sudden, unmanageable outbreaks [36].
Weakened Host Defenses: Drought-stressed plants, for instance, may have compromised defense mechanisms, making them more vulnerable to insect attack, even at lower pest densities [45].
Examples:
Locust Outbreaks: Extreme rainfall events, often linked to changes in oceanic oscillations influenced by climate change, create ideal breeding conditions for locusts (e.g., Desert Locust, African Migratory Locust), leading to massive swarms that devastate crops across vast regions [53, 22].
Forest Insect Outbreaks: Warmer temperatures and prolonged droughts have been linked to severe and extensive outbreaks of bark beetles and defoliators in forests globally, leading to widespread tree mortality and significant economic losses [53].While not directly agricultural, these can affect timber resources and ecosystem services.
The observed and predicted shifts in insect pest dynamics underscore the urgent need for adaptive pest management strategies that account for these evolving threats. The complexity of these interactions necessitates sophisticated predictive tools to inform proactive management decisions.
4. Methodologies for Predicting Pest Dynamics
Predicting insect pest dynamics in a changing climate is crucial for proactive management. This requires robust methodologies that can integrate biological knowledge with climatic data. A range of approaches, from mechanistic models to cutting-edge technologies, is employed, each with its strengths and limitations.
4.1. Mechanistic Models
Mechanistic models simulate the underlying biological processes of insect development, survival, and reproduction based on environmental parameters. They are built on known physiological relationships and offer insights into why populations change.
Degree-Day Models: These are the simplest and most widely used mechanistic models for predicting insect phenology. They are based on the principle that insect development from one life stage to another (e.g., egg to adult) requires the accumulation of a specific amount of heat (degree-days) above a certain lower developmental threshold temperature (Tbase) [13].
Calculation: Degree-days (DD) are calculated daily as:
DD=Mean Daily Temperature−Tbase.
If the mean daily temperature is below Tbase, DD = 0.
Application: Once the total degree-days required for a specific developmental event (e.g., first emergence, peak flight, onset of oviposition) are known for a pest, these models can predict the timing of these events based on observed or projected temperatures.
Strengths: Relatively simple, require minimal data (temperature, Tbase), and are widely applicable for predicting phenological shifts.
Limitations: Do not account for upper lethal temperatures, other environmental factors (e.g., humidity, photoperiod), or variations in host plant availability. They primarily predict timing, not population size.
Climate Change Context: Can be used to project how earlier accumulation of degree-days under a warming climate will shift pest emergence and lead to increased voltinism.
Process-Based Models (Physiologically Based Demographic Models – PBDMs): These are more complex, comprehensive mechanistic models that simulate the entire life cycle of an insect population, accounting for temperature-dependent rates of development, survival, fecundity, and dispersal [49].They often incorporate other environmental factors (e.g., humidity, host plant quality) and can simulate multiple interacting processes.
Application: PBDMs can predict not only phenology but also population growth rates, spatial distribution, and potential for outbreaks under various climate scenarios.
Strengths: Provide a deeper understanding of underlying mechanisms, can integrate multiple environmental factors, and offer more detailed predictions of population dynamics.
Limitations: They require extensive empirical data on insect physiology and ecology, are computationally intensive, and parameterization can be challenging. Model validation is crucial.
Climate Change Context: Offer powerful tools for assessing the impacts of future climate scenarios on pest risk, including range shifts and outbreak potential, by explicitly modeling thermal performance curves across all life stages.
4.2. Statistical Models
Statistical models identify relationships between pest populations and environmental variables based on historical data. They are correlative and predictive rather than explanatory of underlying mechanisms.
Regression Models (Linear, Generalized Linear Models – GLMs): These models relate pest abundance or incidence to environmental variables (e.g., temperature, rainfall, humidity) and other factors (e.g., crop type, pesticide use).
Application: Can be used to identify key climatic drivers of pest outbreaks and to forecast future pest pressure based on climate projections.
Strengths: Relatively straightforward to implement, can identify significant correlations, and are useful for short- to medium-term forecasting.
Limitations: Do not provide mechanistic insights, assume stable relationships (which may change under novel climate conditions), and extrapolation beyond the range of historical data can be unreliable.
Time Series Analysis: This approach analyzes patterns in historical pest population data over time to identify trends, seasonality, and cyclic behavior, often in relation to climatic oscillations.
Application: Useful for identifying lagged effects of climate variables on pest populations and for short-term forecasting.
Strengths: Can capture temporal dependencies and cycles in pest populations.
Limitations: Requires long-term, consistent historical data, and may not fully account for non-linear or sudden shifts in dynamics due to climate change.
Species Distribution Models (SDMs) or Niche Models: These models relate observed species occurrences (presence-absence or abundance) to environmental variables (often climatic) to predict the geographical distribution of a species under current and future climate conditions [21]. Common algorithms include MaxEnt, GLM, random forest, and ensemble approaches.
Application: Primarily used to predict potential range expansions or contractions of pest species under climate change. They can identify new areas at risk of invasion.
Strengths: Can project large-scale geographical shifts, relatively easy to implement with available climate and occurrence data.
Limitations: Rely on assumptions of niche conservatism (species maintain their environmental requirements), do not account for dispersal limitations, biotic interactions (e.g., natural enemies, competition), or evolutionary adaptation. Predictions represent potential habitat suitability, not actual presence or abundance.
Climate Change Context: Widely used to map the potential future distribution of agricultural pests and vector-borne diseases.
4.3. Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems (GIS)
These technologies provide tools for monitoring and mapping pest populations and their environmental context at various spatial scales.
Remote Sensing: Uses satellite or aerial imagery to collect data on vegetation health, land use, temperature, and moisture.
Application:
Early Detection: Identifying stressed crops (e.g., drought-stressed plants, which may be more susceptible to pests) or areas with conditions favorable for pest development (e.g., lush vegetation after rainfall for locusts).
Damage Assessment: Mapping the extent and severity of pest damage across large areas [32].
Habitat Suitability: Providing inputs (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index – NDVI, land surface temperature) for SDMs to improve predictions of pest distribution.
Strengths: Large-scale coverage, non-invasive, allows for rapid assessment and repeated monitoring.
Limitations: Resolution can be a challenge for detecting individual insects or early-stage infestations; ground truthing is always required.
Climate Change Context: Essential for monitoring climate-induced changes in pest distribution and outbreak hotspots, especially for highly mobile pests.
Geographical Information Systems (GIS): Software systems for capturing, storing, analyzing, and displaying geographically referenced data.
Application: Integrating pest occurrence data with climatic layers, land use maps, and other environmental information to visualize pest distribution, identify risk zones, and manage control operations [59].
Strengths: Powerful for spatial analysis, visualization, and decision support in pest management.
Limitations: Data quality and availability can be limiting.
Climate Change Context: Used to overlay current and projected climate data with pest distributions to identify areas of future risk and guide resource allocation for adaptive management.
4.4. Omics Technologies (Genomics, Transcriptomics)
These cutting-edge molecular tools offer insights into the genetic basis of insect responses to climate change and their potential for adaptation.
Genomics: Analyzing the entire genome of pest species.
Application: Identifying genes associated with thermal tolerance, desiccation resistance, diapause regulation, and insecticide resistance (specific adaptations linked to climate change) [9]. It can track gene flow and rapid evolutionary adaptation in response to changing environments.
Strengths: Provides fundamental insights into adaptive potential and mechanisms.
Limitations: Complex data analysis, requires advanced bioinformatics expertise.
Transcriptomics: Studying gene expression patterns (RNA) in response to different environmental conditions.
Application: Identifying genes that are up- or down-regulated under heat stress, drought stress, or altered host plant quality. This reveals the physiological pathways insects use to cope with climate-induced changes (e.g., heat shock proteins, metabolic adjustments).
Strengths: Reveals active biological responses to stress.
Limitations: Snapshots of gene activity, do not directly show protein function or phenotype.
Proteomics and Metabolomics: Analyzing proteins and metabolites, respectively, to understand functional responses to stress.
Strengths: Provide further layers of functional insights into insect stress responses.
Limitations: Still developing for routine pest management applications.
Climate Change Context: These technologies are crucial for understanding the evolutionary capacity of pests to adapt to novel climates and to identify potential genetic vulnerabilities that could be exploited for management. For example, understanding the genetic basis of insecticide resistance as it shifts with climate-driven selective pressures.
By combining these diverse methodologies, researchers and practitioners can develop a more holistic and robust predictive framework for anticipating and responding to climate-induced insect pest dynamics.
5. Management Strategies for Climate-Induced Pest Dynamics
The escalating and unpredictable nature of climate-induced insect pest shifts necessitates a fundamental rethinking and adaptation of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies. IPM, traditionally a holistic approach combining various tactics, must become more dynamic, proactive, and resilient to climate variability.
5.1. Adapting Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
IPM is an ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on long-term prevention of pests through a combination of techniques such as biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural practices, and use of resistant varieties. Pesticides are used only after monitoring indicates they are needed according to established guidelines. Adapting IPM for climate change involves enhancing existing components and integrating new technologies and knowledge.
5.1.1. Monitoring and Early Warning Systems
Effective monitoring is the cornerstone of any IPM program, enabling timely and targeted interventions. Climate change makes enhanced monitoring even more critical.
Enhanced Surveillance Networks: Expanding and intensifying existing pest surveillance networks to cover broader geographical areas, including new regions at risk of invasion due to range expansion (e.g., higher latitudes/altitudes). This includes sentinel plots and trap networks.
Real-time Data Collection and Sharing: Implementing digital tools, mobile applications, and citizen science initiatives to facilitate rapid and widespread collection and sharing of pest occurrence data.
Integration with Climate Data: Developing and deploying early warning systems that integrate real-time pest monitoring data with meteorological data (temperature, rainfall, humidity) and climate projections. This allows for anticipatory warnings of pest outbreaks or shifts in phenology [53]. For instance, linking pest trap counts with degree-day accumulations for specific pests.
Remote Sensing and GIS for Surveillance: Utilizing satellite imagery, UAVs (drones), and ground-based sensors with GIS platforms to monitor crop health, detect early signs of stress or infestation, and map pest hotspots over large areas [3].This is particularly useful for highly mobile or widely distributed pests.
5.1.2. Resistant Varieties
Developing and deploying crop varieties with enhanced resistance or tolerance to pests is a sustainable and environmentally friendly long-term solution.
Breeding for Multi-Stress Resistance: Future breeding programs must simultaneously focus on resistance to multiple climate-induced stresses. For example, developing varieties that are not only pest-resistant but also tolerant to drought and heat stress, as stressed plants are often more susceptible to pests [57].
Exploiting Genetic Diversity: Tapping into wild relatives, landraces, and underutilized crop species that may harbor novel resistance genes against emerging or adapting pests [19].
Genetic Engineering and Gene Editing: Utilizing modern biotechnology to introduce or enhance pest resistance genes in elite crop varieties. This can involve:
Bt Crops: Continual development and deployment of Bt crops (expressing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis) with pyramided traits (multiple Bt genes) to manage resistance development and broaden the spectrum of protection against key lepidopteran pests, while considering climate impacts on pest resistance evolution [62].
RNAi Technology: Developing crops that express RNA interference (RNAi) constructs to silence essential pest genes, offering highly specific pest control [5].
Gene Editing (CRISPR/Cas9): Precisely modifying plant genes to enhance endogenous defense mechanisms or alter plant traits to reduce pest attractiveness or digestibility (e.g., increasing physical barriers, altering secondary metabolite profiles) [36].
Altering Phenology of Varieties: Breeding for varieties with altered phenology (e.g., earlier or later maturity) to escape peak pest pressure, if the pest’s phenology is more predictable than the crop’s.
5.1.3. Biological Control
Harnessing natural enemies (predators, parasitoids, entomopathogens) is a cornerstone of IPM. Climate change poses challenges but also opportunities for adaptive biological control.
Understanding Natural Enemy Responses: Prioritizing research to understand how climate change affects the phenology, distribution, survival, and efficacy of key natural enemies. If natural enemies are more sensitive to climate change than their hosts, it can lead to “enemy release” and pest outbreaks [37].
Adaptive Release Strategies: Adjusting release timings and rates of beneficial insects in augmentative biological control programs to account for phenological shifts in pests and their natural enemies.
Conservation Biological Control: Implementing cultural practices that conserve and enhance natural enemy populations in agricultural landscapes (e.g., providing refugia, alternative food sources, diverse cropping systems). This includes selecting pest-resistant varieties that do not harm natural enemies.
Selection of Climate-Resilient Natural Enemies: Identifying and breeding strains of natural enemies that are more tolerant to predicted temperature extremes or drier conditions, or selecting those with broader thermal ranges, for use in biological control programs [23].
Microbial Biopesticides: Developing and deploying microbial biopesticides (e.g., fungi, bacteria, viruses) that are robust under a wider range of climatic conditions, or identifying new strains effective under novel temperature/humidity regimes [27].
5.1.4. Cultural Practices
Modification of farming practices can play a crucial role in managing climate-induced pest dynamics.
Adjusting Planting Dates: Altering planting and harvesting dates to avoid periods of peak pest activity or to break the synchrony between pests and susceptible crop stages [36]. This requires localized climate and pest phenology data.
Crop Rotation and Diversification: Implementing longer and more diverse crop rotations to break pest life cycles and reduce host availability. Increasing crop diversity at the landscape level can enhance natural enemy populations and dilute pest pressure [43].
Trap Cropping and Push-Pull Strategies: Using trap crops to attract pests away from the main crop, or push-pull strategies that combine repellent (push) and attractive (pull) plants to manipulate pest behavior [12]. These can be adapted to new pest distributions or phenologies.
Improved Water and Nutrient Management: Maintaining optimal plant health through efficient irrigation and balanced nutrient application can enhance plant resilience and defense against pests, especially when plants are under drought or heat stress.
Sanitation and Residue Management: Removing crop residues or volunteer plants that can harbor overwintering pests or serve as early-season hosts, especially for pests whose overwintering success is enhanced by warmer winters.
Soil Health Management: Practices that enhance soil health (e.g., no-till, cover cropping) can improve soil moisture retention and nutrient cycling, contributing to healthier plants more resilient to both abiotic stress and pest attack [1].
5.1.5. Chemical Control
While not the primary solution in climate-adaptive IPM, chemical control remains an important tool, but its application must be more judicious and strategic.
Targeted and Timely Application: Relying on robust monitoring and predictive models to ensure pesticides are applied only when necessary, at the right time, and to the right areas, minimizing off-target effects and resistance development [35].
Resistance Management: Implementing rigorous resistance management strategies, as climate change can alter pest biology and selection pressures, potentially accelerating the development of insecticide resistance [65]. This includes rotating pesticide classes and using mixtures.
Biopesticides and Soft Chemistry: Prioritizing the use of biopesticides (microbial, botanical) and reduced-risk, selective chemical pesticides that have minimal impact on natural enemies and the environment.
Last Resort Strategy: Positioning chemical control as a last resort, to be used only when other IPM tactics are insufficient to prevent economic damage.
5.2. Policy and Research Needs
Effective climate-adaptive pest management requires supportive policies, increased research investment, and strong international collaboration.
Policy Frameworks: Governments need to develop policies that promote climate-smart agriculture and adaptive IPM, including incentives for farmers, capacity building, and enabling regulatory environments for new technologies.
International Collaboration: Given the transboundary nature of many migratory pests and the global scale of climate change, international research collaborations and harmonized surveillance and warning systems (e.g., FAO’s Desert Locust Information Service) are vital [22].
Capacity Building: Investing in training and education for farmers, extension workers, and researchers on climate-adaptive pest management techniques.
Interdisciplinary Research: Fostering interdisciplinary research that integrates climate science, entomology, plant pathology, agronomy, genetics, remote sensing, and socio-economic studies to develop holistic solutions.
Long-term Monitoring: Establishing and maintaining long-term, high-quality ecological and pest population data series, which are essential for robust climate change impact assessments and model development.
By adopting these adaptive management strategies, agricultural systems can enhance their resilience to climate-induced pest dynamics, ensuring food security and environmental sustainability in a changing world.
Note: Many pest dynamics are influenced by a combination of climate factors, and impacts can vary regionally.
6. Case Studies of Climate-Induced Pest Dynamics and Management
Examining specific case studies provides concrete examples of how climate change is impacting pest dynamics and the ensuing challenges for agricultural management.
6.1. Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) – Expansion due to Warming
The Fall Armyworm (FAW) is a highly polyphagous and destructive lepidopteran pest native to the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas. Its recent, rapid global spread since 2016 to Africa, Asia, and Australia exemplifies a climate-aided invasion with devastating consequences for food security, particularly for maize, a staple crop [20].
Climate Link: FAW is sensitive to cold temperatures. Its native range is limited by freezing temperatures, with populations only overwintering in warmer regions like Florida and South Texas in North America. Milder winters and rising average temperatures globally have facilitated its rapid establishment and spread. Warmer conditions reduce overwintering mortality, allow for more rapid development and increased voltinism (multiple generations per year), and extend the period of activity in newly colonized areas [18]. Strong winds associated with weather systems, which can be influenced by climate change, also aid its long-distance migration.
Observed Shifts: The swift and unprecedented spread of FAW across Africa (2016), Asia (2018), and Australia (2020) demonstrated its remarkable dispersal capabilities coupled with favorable climatic conditions [26, 10]. In many newly invaded regions, FAW can complete more generations per year than historically observed for native lepidopteran pests, leading to sustained and higher levels of damage.
Impacts: FAW has caused significant yield losses in maize (estimated 20-50% in some African countries), severely impacting smallholder farmers [15]. Its polyphagous nature means it can switch to other crops (sorghum, rice, millet, cotton, sugarcane) when maize is unavailable, exacerbating the threat. This has led to increased reliance on synthetic pesticides, raising concerns about resistance development, environmental pollution, and human health.
Management Adaptations:
Enhanced Monitoring and Early Warning: Development of rapid detection tools (e.g., mobile apps for identification, pheromone trap networks) to track its spread and monitor population levels.
Biological Control: Release of natural enemies (e.g., parasitoids like Telenomus remus) in newly invaded regions where native natural enemies may not be sufficiently adapted to control FAW [41]. Conservation of existing natural enemies.
Resistant Varieties: Breeding and deployment of maize varieties with native resistance (e.g., Bt maize) where regulations permit, or varieties with enhanced conventional resistance mechanisms.
Cultural Practices: Promoting practices like push-pull technology (e.g., intercropping maize with repellent plants and trap plants to deter FAW), good agronomy to support healthy plants, and timely planting/harvesting.
Community-Based IPM: Encouraging farmer field schools and community-level pest surveillance and management to ensure widespread adoption of adaptive strategies.
6.2. Aphids – Phenological Shifts, Increased Generations, and Virus Transmission
Aphids are notorious agricultural pests, primarily through direct feeding damage (sucking phloem sap) and, more critically, by vectoring numerous plant viruses. Their life cycles are highly responsive to temperature.
Climate Link: Milder winters and earlier, warmer springs significantly impact aphid dynamics. Warmer temperatures allow earlier emergence from overwintering stages, accelerate development, and increase the number of generations per year [28]. Extreme weather can also play a role; strong winds facilitate long-distance dispersal of winged morphs.
Observed Shifts:
Earlier Spring Migrations: Studies across Europe and North America have documented earlier spring flights of various aphid species (e.g., cereal aphids, peach-potato aphid), leading to earlier colonization of crops [6].
Extended Growing Season Activity: Aphid populations persist for longer into the late autumn due to prolonged warm periods, extending the period of crop exposure to damage and virus transmission.
Increased Virus Incidence: The combination of earlier emergence, increased generations, and prolonged activity often translates to a higher incidence and earlier onset of aphid-borne viral diseases in crops (e.g., Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus in cereals, Potato Virus Y in potatoes) [52].
Impacts: Increased direct damage, significant yield losses due to viral diseases, and greater reliance on insecticides for control, leading to concerns about insecticide resistance and environmental impact.
Management Adaptations:
Enhanced Monitoring: Using suction traps and yellow water pans to monitor aphid flight activity and arrival dates, adjusting thresholds based on predicted phenology [67].
Forecast Models: Utilizing temperature-driven models to predict aphid population build-up and migration timing to inform insecticide application or beneficial insect releases.
Resistant Varieties: Breeding for virus-resistant crop varieties is a primary strategy to mitigate the increased risk of aphid-borne diseases. Also, varieties with non-preference or antibiosis resistance to aphids.
Biological Control: Conserving natural enemies (ladybirds, lacewings, hoverflies, parasitoid wasps) through habitat management. Adaptive release strategies for augmentative biological control.
Cultural Practices: Adjusting planting dates where feasible, removing volunteer plants that can harbor aphids, and implementing diversified cropping systems to enhance natural enemy populations.
Targeted Chemical Control: Applying insecticides only when necessary based on monitoring and forecasting, prioritizing selective insecticides, and implementing strict anti-resistance strategies.
6.3. Bark Beetles – Increased Outbreaks in Forests due to Warming/Drought
Bark beetles (e.g., mountain pine beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae, spruce bark beetle Ips typographus) are significant pests of coniferous forests, causing widespread tree mortality. Their outbreaks are strongly linked to climate change.
Climate Link: Rising temperatures reduce the time required to complete a life cycle (increased voltinism), reduce overwintering mortality (especially in previously cold regions), and allow range expansion to higher latitudes and altitudes [7]. Critically, prolonged droughts weaken host trees, making them more susceptible to attack by reducing their ability to produce defensive resins [24]. The synergistic effect of warmer temperatures and drought stress on trees is a key driver of outbreaks.
Observed Shifts:
Expanded Geographical Range: The mountain pine beetle, for example, has expanded its range northward and into higher elevations in North America, crossing climatic barriers (lodgepole pine forests in Canada) previously thought impenetrable [54].
Increased Voltinism: In many areas, bark beetles are completing two generations per year instead of one, leading to exponential population growth and more intense outbreaks.
Increased Frequency and Severity of Outbreaks: Unprecedented and extensive outbreaks across vast areas of North American and European forests have been directly linked to recent warming trends and severe droughts [53].
Impacts: Massive tree mortality, leading to significant economic losses in the timber industry, increased wildfire risk (from dead, dry trees), altered forest ecosystems, and impacts on carbon sequestration.
Management Adaptations (Forests, but principles applicable to agroforestry):
Forest Health Management: Promoting resilient forest ecosystems through diversified species composition, appropriate stand densities, and management that reduces tree stress (e.g., thinning, reducing competition).
Early Detection and Rapid Response: Implementing aerial surveys, remote sensing, and ground crews for early detection of initial outbreaks, followed by rapid removal of infested trees (e.g., trap trees, salvage logging) to prevent spread [40].
Resistant Tree Varieties: Long-term breeding programs to develop conifer varieties with enhanced resistance to bark beetle attack (e.g., through increased resin production).
Landscape-level Planning: Developing regional pest management plans that consider climate change projections, identify vulnerable forest stands and prioritize management actions.
Pheromone Traps and Semiochemicals: Using aggregation pheromones to trap beetles or anti-aggregation pheromones to deter attacks on high-value trees.
6.4. Locusts – Impact of Extreme Rainfall on Outbreaks
Locusts (e.g., Desert Locust, African Migratory Locust) are polyphagous, highly migratory grasshoppers with the ability to form massive swarms that can devastate crops and pastures across continents, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Their outbreaks are strongly linked to favorable rainfall patterns.
Climate Link: While not directly driven by temperature increases, locust outbreaks are critically dependent on specific rainfall patterns. Heavy, unseasonable rainfall in arid breeding grounds (often linked to climate variability, including anomalous sea surface temperatures influencing atmospheric circulation) provides the lush vegetation and moist soil conditions necessary for egg laying, nymphal development, and subsequent population explosions [53, 22]. Prolonged droughts can suppress populations, but subsequent heavy rains can trigger massive outbreaks.
Observed Shifts: The severe Desert Locust outbreaks in East Africa and the Arabian Peninsula from 2019-2021 were directly linked to unusually heavy rainfall associated with the Indian Ocean Dipole anomaly, itself potentially influenced by climate change [22]. These events created multiple generations of breeding, leading to exponential population growth and vast swarms.
Impacts: Catastrophic crop destruction over vast areas, leading to severe food insecurity, loss of livelihoods, and humanitarian crises in already vulnerable regions. The 2019-2021 outbreak threatened millions with starvation.
Management Adaptations:
International Surveillance and Forecasting: The FAO’s Desert Locust Information Service (DLIS) is a prime example of an international early warning system. It integrates satellite imagery (for green vegetation, soil moisture), meteorological data, and ground surveys to predict breeding areas and migration routes [22]. This system needs to be strengthened to account for increased climate variability.
Proactive Control: Emphasizing early detection and rapid, targeted control operations (primarily with biopesticides or selective chemical pesticides) in breeding areas before swarms can form. This is far more effective and less environmentally damaging than reactive control of large swarms.
Capacity Building: Strengthening national locust control units in affected countries, providing training, equipment, and resources for effective surveillance and control.
Research on Locust Biology: Understanding the physiology of phase transformation (from solitary to gregarious) and its environmental triggers to improve predictive models.
Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Supporting farming practices that enhance resilience to both locust damage and underlying climate variability, e.g., drought-resistant crops, diversified farming systems.
These case studies highlight the diverse ways in which climate change influences pest dynamics, underscoring the urgency and complexity of developing adaptive management strategies. Each pest-climate interaction requires a tailored understanding and response, built upon robust scientific prediction and flexible, integrated management.
7. Challenges and Future Directions
Despite significant advancements in understanding and predicting climate-induced pest dynamics, several profound challenges remain. Addressing these challenges will be critical for developing robust and adaptive management strategies for future food security.
7.1. Data Gaps and Uncertainty
Lack of Long-Term, Fine-Scale Data: Reliable prediction models require extensive, long-term datasets on insect phenology, population dynamics, and concurrent microclimatic conditions. Such detailed data are often scarce, especially in developing regions where climate change impacts on agriculture are most severe [61].
Uncertainty in Climate Projections: While global climate models provide valuable insights, downscaling these to regional and local scales, which is necessary for precise pest predictions, introduces significant uncertainties, particularly for extreme events and precipitation patterns [33].
Phenotypic Plasticity and Adaptation: Insects exhibit considerable phenotypic plasticity (ability to adjust phenotype in response to environment) and rapid evolutionary adaptation (changes in gene frequencies). Current models often struggle to incorporate these dynamic biological responses, leading to underestimation or misprediction of pest shifts [9, 30].
7.2. Complex Interactions
Multi-trophic Interactions: Pest dynamics are not solely driven by climate but are deeply embedded in complex ecological networks involving host plants, natural enemies, competitors, and other environmental factors (e.g., soil health, nutrient availability). Climate change can alter the strength and direction of these interactions in unpredictable ways, leading to cascading effects [17]. For instance, a phenological mismatch between a pest and its specific parasitoid can lead to outbreaks, a phenomenon difficult to predict without detailed interaction data.
Combined Stresses: As highlighted, climate change involves multiple interacting stressors (e.g., heat, drought, elevated CO$_2$). The combined effects on insects and plants are often non-additive and highly complex, making single-factor predictions inadequate.
Non-linear Responses and Thresholds: Insect responses to climate variables are often non-linear, with sudden shifts or thresholds (e.g., a critical temperature beyond which mortality sharply increases). Predicting these thresholds and sudden changes in population dynamics is challenging [36].
7.3. Predicting Evolutionary Adaptation
Rapid Evolution: Insects, with their short generation times, high reproductive rates, and large population sizes, possess immense evolutionary potential. They can rapidly adapt to new thermal regimes, host plants, and even acquire resistance to insecticides under novel selective pressures imposed by climate change [63]. Predicting the speed and direction of this evolutionary adaptation (e.g., changes in thermal performance curves, diapause strategies) is a major scientific frontier.
Genetic Variation: Understanding the genetic variation for climate-relevant traits within pest populations is crucial for assessing their adaptive capacity, but this requires extensive genomic and physiological studies.
7.4. Policy and Implementation Barriers
Bridging Science to Practice: Translating complex scientific predictions and adaptive management recommendations into practical, actionable advice for farmers and policymakers remains a significant challenge. This requires effective communication, extension services, and decision-support tools tailored to local contexts.
Resource Constraints: Implementing sophisticated monitoring systems, developing resistant varieties, and deploying new technologies require substantial investment, which may be lacking in vulnerable, resource-poor agricultural regions.
Transboundary Nature: Many migratory pests transcend national borders, necessitating international cooperation and coordinated policies, which are often difficult to achieve [22]. Socio-economic Factors: Farmer adoption of new management strategies is influenced by socio-economic factors, risk perception, access to credit, and market incentives. Climate-adaptive IPM needs to be economically viable and socially acceptable.
7.5. Future Directions
To meet these challenges, future research and management efforts must focus on several key areas:
Integrated Monitoring and Forecasting Systems:
Smart Surveillance: Developing and deploying intelligent, networked sensor systems (e.g., IoT-enabled traps, automated camera systems, real-time weather stations) for continuous, high-resolution monitoring of pest populations and microclimates.
AI and Machine Learning: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (e.g., neural networks, deep learning) for:
Predictive Modeling: Integrating diverse, complex datasets (climate, pest, host, natural enemy, satellite imagery) to build more accurate and dynamic predictive models of pest outbreaks and shifts.
Image Recognition: Automating pest identification and counting from images captured by traps or drones.
Optimized Management Decisions: Developing AI-driven decision support systems that provide farmers with real-time, localized recommendations for pest management based on current conditions and future forecasts.
Big Data Integration and Platforms: Establishing national and international platforms for aggregating, standardizing, and sharing climate, pest, crop, and management data. This will enable large-scale analyses and model development.
Mechanistic-Empirical Hybrids: Developing hybrid models that combine the mechanistic understanding of insect physiology with the predictive power of empirical/statistical approaches, particularly machine learning, to improve accuracy and robustness across diverse conditions [44].
Genomic and Evolutionary Ecology: Investing in research to understand the genetic basis of insect responses to climate change, including the potential for rapid adaptation. This involves functional genomics, population genomics, and experimental evolution studies to predict how pests might evolve in a warming world.
Climate-Smart Breeding for Resistance: Prioritizing breeding efforts for crop varieties that exhibit broad-spectrum pest resistance, tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses, and enhanced resilience under variable climatic conditions. This includes leveraging gene editing for precise trait manipulation.
Biocontrol in a Changing Climate: Focused research on selecting, breeding, and deploying natural enemies that are robust to climate variability and effective against adapting pest populations. This involves understanding their thermal limits, phenological flexibility, and host-finding abilities under new environmental conditions.
Ecosystem-Based Approaches: Moving towards more holistic, ecosystem-based pest management strategies that enhance agricultural biodiversity, soil health, and natural ecological processes to build inherent system resilience to climate change impacts on pests. This includes promoting agroecology and diversified farming systems.
Enhanced International Collaboration and Capacity Building: Strengthening global networks for pest surveillance, data sharing, and rapid response, particularly for transboundary pests. Investing in training and infrastructure in vulnerable countries to equip them with the tools and knowledge to manage evolving pest threats.
By embracing these future directions, the agricultural community can build more resilient pest management systems that are capable of adapting to the complexities of climate change, ultimately safeguarding global food production and the livelihoods of farmers worldwide.
8. Conclusion
The intricate interplay between a rapidly changing climate and the dynamic populations of insect pests represents one of the most formidable challenges to global food security in the 21st century. This comprehensive review has illuminated the multifaceted mechanisms through which rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, elevated CO2concentrations, and intensified extreme weather events exert profound influences on insect physiology, behavior, and population dynamics. From direct physiological impacts on development, reproduction, and survival to indirect effects mediated through host plant quality and the effectiveness of natural enemies, the pathways of climate influence are diverse and often synergistic.
Observed and predicted shifts in pest dynamics are already reshaping agricultural landscapes worldwide. These include significant geographical range expansions towards higher latitudes and altitudes, a pervasive increase in insect voltinism (leading to more generations per year), and critical alterations in phenology that can result in detrimental mismatches between pests, their host plants, and their natural enemies. Such shifts often culminate in heightened frequencies and severities of pest outbreaks, posing unprecedented challenges for crop protection. As highlighted in Table 1, the interconnectedness of these climate drivers means that a holistic approach to understanding and managing pest dynamics is essential. For instance, rising temperatures combined with altered precipitation can create a dual threat, accelerating pest development while simultaneously weakening host plant defenses and suppressing natural enemy populations, leading to exponential increases in pest pressure.
Effective prediction of these complex dynamics is paramount for proactive management. Methodologies ranging from the foundational degree-day models and more sophisticated process-based ecological models to advanced statistical approaches like Species Distribution Models (SDMs), coupled with the power of remote sensing and GIS for real-time monitoring, offer critical insights. Furthermore, cutting-edge ‘omics’ technologies are beginning to unravel the genetic basis of insect adaptability, providing clues for predicting evolutionary responses to climate change.
The imperative to adapt Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies has never been more urgent. This requires a dynamic and adaptive approach encompassing enhanced monitoring and early warning systems (leveraging digital tools and climate data), the continuous breeding and deployment of climate-resilient crop varieties (often with multi-stress resistance), and a renewed focus on biological control (understanding and adapting natural enemy releases and conservation). Cultural practices must be flexible, including adjustments to planting dates and promoting diversified agroecosystems that inherently build resilience. While chemical control remains a tool, its use must be highly judicious, guided by precise forecasts and rigorous resistance management. The case studies, as summarized in Table 2, emphatically illustrate these points: the fall armyworm’s rapid global expansion underscores the need for international surveillance, aphids’ phenological shifts demand adaptive biological control and resistant varieties, and bark beetle and locust outbreaks necessitate large-scale, climate-informed predictive and responsive strategies.
Despite the significant strides, challenges persist, notably data gaps, the inherent complexity of multi-trophic interactions, and the formidable task of predicting rapid evolutionary adaptation in pest populations. Moving forward, the future of climate-adaptive pest management hinges on a commitment to interdisciplinary research, harnessing the transformative potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive modeling and decision support, ensuring robust long-term data collection, and fostering unparalleled international collaboration. Only through such integrated, science-driven, and adaptive approaches can we hope to effectively predict, mitigate, and manage the evolving threat of insect pest shifts, thereby safeguarding global agricultural productivity and ensuring a resilient food future for all.
9. References
[1] The adaptation and mitigation potential of agroecological approaches in a changing climate. Climate Change Management, 103-118.
[2] Responses of insect pests to climate change: what can we say with confidence?. Ecology Letters, 8(7), 785-794.
[3] Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science, 19(1), 52-61.
[4] Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Global Change Biology, 8(1), 1-16.
[5] Control of Colorado potato beetle larvae through RNA interference. Nature Biotechnology, 25(11), 1322-1326.
[6] Climate change and aphid population dynamics: the role of winter warming. Ecological Entomology, 35(2), 241-253.
[7] Climate change and bark beetles of the Western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience, 60(8), 602-613.
[8] Global change effects on plant–herbivore interactions: implications for agroecosystems. Plant Pathology, 57(2), 205-225.
[9] Climate change: Evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Current Biology, 16(10), R397-R398.
[10] Fall Armyworm Portal. Retrieved from [https://www.fallarmyworm.org/]{.underline}
[11] The implications of predicted climate change for insect pests in the UK. Aspects of Applied Biology, 51, 223-234.
[12] The use of push–pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 375-400.
[13] Degree-day models: history and use in pest management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 86(6), 1845-1854.
[14] Effect of temperature on development and survival of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on grapevines. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105(2), 400-409.
[15] The spread of fall armyworm in Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 46(2), 107-111.
[16] Physiological and molecular adaptations to cold and heat. Chapman & Hall.
[17] Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science, 361(6402), 916-919.
[18] The effect of temperature on the development of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 113(2), 652-659.
[19] Legume agriculture and soil health for food security in rainfed environments. Journal of Crop Improvement, 30(4), 503-532.
[20] Global threat from Spodoptera frugiperda in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change, 8(11), 940-942.
[21] Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677-697.
[22] Desert Locust Watch. Retrieved from [http://www.fao.org/locusts/en/]{.underline}
[23] Climate change effects on host–parasitoid interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82(2), 488-498.
[24] Response of mountain pine beetle to drought stress in lodgepole pine. Forest Science, 49(5), 705-714.
[25] Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812-818.
[26] First report of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa. PLoS One, 11(9), e0165542.
[27] Fungi. In Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology (pp. 207-285). Academic Press.
[28] Changes in the aerial abundance of the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae, in the UK, 1969-2004. Global Change Biology, 16(3), 1056-1063.
[29] The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67(3), 283-335.
[30] Climate change and the genetic basis of adaptation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(1), 1-8.
[31] The effect of temperature on body size and fecundity of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Thermal Biology, 30(3), 241-247.
[32] Integrating remote sensing into agricultural pest management: Current status and future trends. Pest Management Science, 63(10), 875-889.
[33] Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[34] Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
[35] International standards for phytosanitary measures (ISPM) 39: International movement of fruit flies (Tephritidae). FAO.
[36] Climate change drives an increase in forest insect outbreaks in Europe. Global Change Biology, 25(6), 1947-1959.
[37] The impact of climate change on host–parasitoid interactions. Ecology Letters, 16(5), 652-661.
[38] Heat stress and the fitness costs of rapid thermal acclimation. Evolution, 67(10), 2728-2736.
[39] Size, temperature, and the allometry of insect performance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211(Pt 15), 2419-2428.
[40] Adaptive forest management strategies in the face of climate change. Journal of Forestry, 108(4), 163-171.
[41] The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) outbreaks in Ethiopia: biology, impact and management options. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(27), 1391-1400.
[42] Impact of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), in North America and Europe: a review. Annual Review of Entomology, 63, 599-619.
[43] Effects of crop diversification on insect pests and natural enemies: a meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 559-575.
[44] Hybrid models combining mechanistic and statistical approaches to forecast insect outbreaks. Ecological Modelling, 306, 16-24.
[45] The role of drought in insect outbreaks. BioScience, 37(2), 110-118.
[46] The response of a natural enemy to a pest outbreak: density dependence in host-parasitoid interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66(2), 246-258.
[47] European phenological response to climate change impacts in agriculture. Global Change Biology, 12(7), 1145-1160.
[48] Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 637-669.
[49] Physiologically based models for insect life cycle and impact. Annual Review of Entomology, 57, 185-207.
[50] Unseasonably warm winters and outbreaks of the pine processionary moth. Global Change Biology, 13(10), 2092-2101.
[51] The effects of elevated CO2 on insect herbivory. Global Change Biology, 18(9), 2735-2746.
[52] Plant virus epidemics in a changing world. Plant Molecular Biology, 79(1-2), 177-183.
[53] Climate change and extreme weather events: implications for food production and security. Global Change Biology, 7(10), 915-927.
[54] The biology and population dynamics of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. Forestry Compendium, CABI.
[55] The Global Crop Production Gap: Losses, Gains, and Opportunities. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 57, 469-497.
[56] Potential effects of climate change on the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in the United States. Environmental Entomology, 35(2), 273-281.
[57] Breeding for insect resistance in crop plants under changing climatic conditions: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 692735.
[58] Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 64(4), 649-672.
[59] GIS-based assessment of land use changes and their impact on vegetation in a rapidly urbanizing area. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 481-492.
[60] Climate variability and the dynamics of outbreak populations of the moth, Epirrita autumnata. Ecology, 87(9), 2320-2329.
[61] Climate change impacts on insect pests: future challenges for management. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 17, 63-71.
[62] Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first two decades. Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 239-261.
[63] Ecological and evolutionary responses to climate change. Nature, 411(6839), 580-584.
[64] Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier.
[65] The molecular evolution of acaricide resistance in spider mites. Annual Review of Entomology, 61, 175-197.
[66] Evolutionary responses to climate change. Current Biology, 20(2), R129-R131.
[67] Temperature, climate change and aphid pest management. Crop Protection, 81, 6-12.
[68] Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508-513.
[69] Climate change and the risk of invasive species. In Climate Change and Invasive Species (pp. 17-40). Springer.
[70] Effect of temperature on development and reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from different geographical populations. Journal of Insect Science, 11(1), 1-14.
[71] The climate-food link: future challenges for agriculture. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(22), 12224-12232.
[72] Effects of elevated CO2 on plant-insect interactions: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 12(5), 785-796.